{"id":4116,"date":"2018-06-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-06-23T07:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/us-chinaforum.com\/archives\/4116"},"modified":"2018-06-23T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2018-06-23T07:00:00","slug":"254-6-23-dr-wordman-an-american-thinktank-scholars-objective-view-on-pivot-to-asia-i","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/us-chinaforum.com\/en\/2018\/4116\/","title":{"rendered":"#254 6\/23 Dr. Wordman\u00a0An American ThinkTank Scholar\u2019s Objective View on Pivot to Asia (I)"},"content":{"rendered":"
 
Pivot to Asia has been a key component of the U.S. foreign policy since Obama Administration. With Asian countries rapidly rising economically, such a policy is logical. However, the interpretation and implementation of the policy is subject to question on its true purpose and ultimate objectives. The current tension in the South China Sea, Korea Peninsula and Iran and over all intense relationship with and among China, India, Japan and Russia begs answers on what does the U.S. really hope to accomplish with her Asia Pacific foreign policy. The actions and their consequences up till now have left Asia in stress against Asian countries\u2019 desire which is to achieve prosperity through economic development. The U.S. seems to have made a wrong assumption or taken the wrong actions leading to unexpected outcome.
 
The \u2018Pivot\u2019 or \u2018Rebalancing\u2019 term was introduced in the Fall of 2011 during the Obama Administration, but the core of its strategy of shifting emphasis to Asia was a continuation from the G. W. Bush government and the early stage of Obama\u2019s first term, such as strengthening ties with existing allies in Asia, redeploying or balancing troops and increasing naval presence in Asia, signing free trade agreement with South Korea and engaging with TPP development as well as cultivating partnership with India and Vietnam. Obama\u2019s formal announcement on \u2018Pivot\u2019 and taking actions in military sphere such as new deployment of troops and equipments to Australia and Singapore certainly had alerted China worrying what is the real purpose of the \u2018Pivot\u2019.
 
As a Congress Research Report, authored by seven social scientists (Mark Manyin et. al.) on March 28, 2012, stated, the \u201cpivot\u201d is a conviction (benefit) that the center of gravity for U.S. foreign policy, national security, and economic interests is being realigned and shifted towards Asia, and that the U.S. strategy and priorities will be adjusted accordingly. However, the report noted the risk of \u2018pivot\u2019 being its \u2018cost\u2018 which may cause a significant reduction of U.S. defense spending elsewhere, a reduction in U.S. military capacity in other parts of the world, and may jeopardize the Congressional plan to cut Navy spending. Additionally, the perception among many that the \u201crebalancing\u201d is targeted against China could strengthen the hand of Chinese hard-liners thus deteriorating US-China Relation and making it more difficult for the United States to gain China\u2019s cooperation on a range of issues. Moreover, the report warned that the pivot\u2019s prominence would have raised the \u2019costs\u2018 to the United States if it (Obama) or successor administrations (Trump) failed to follow through on the \u2018pivot\u2019 plan. One key assumption, that for years \u2018many\u2019 countries in Asia have encouraged the U.S. to step up its activities to provide a counter balance to China\u2019s rising influence, is later proven not exactly correct. The Asian nations, seemingly changing more so lately\uff08with Japan as an exception perhaps\uff09, want a peaceful environment for economic development rather than a stressful confrontational atmosphere brought on by \u2018pivot\u2019.
 
There are many essays written about \u2018Pivot\u2019. From a nice early assessment made by Kenneth Lieberthal, The American Pivot to Asia – Why President Obama\u2019s turn to the East is easier said than done, Foreign Policy 12\/21\/20111, to a latest PhD research work, The Case of the Pivot to Asia – System Effects and the Origin of Strategy, by Nicholas D. Anderson and Victor D. Cha, Professor at George Washington University and former Ambassador to South Korea (SK), Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 132, no. 4, 2017-18, one can see that there is a lot of issues concerning how the \u2018Pivot\u2019 was executed and what was accomplished. After researching these \u2018pivot\u2019 studies, I have found one article by Emanuel Pastreich, an American academic, very revealing about the intriguing intention of the \u2018Pivot\u2019 program and how the US military establishment is really in control of it. Pastreich was born in Nashville, TN, (10\/16\/1964), attended Lowell High School in San Francisco and began studies in Yale University and obtained a B.A. degree in Chinese (1987, during college he also studied abroad at Taiwan University), then obtained a M.A. degree in comparative literature from Tokyo University (1991, dissertation in Japanese language) and completed his PhD in East Asian Studies from Harvard University (1998). So Pastreich is an American scholar with a deep understanding of Asia.
 
It is necessary to go into Dr. Pastreich\u2019s background to appreciate his views on the U.S. foreign policy on Asia. Academically, he served as assistant professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana\u2013Champaign, George Washington University, and Solbridge International School of Business. He is currently an associate professor at the College of International Studies, Kyung Hee University. Previously he served as an international relations and foreign investment adviser to the governor of Chungnam Province (2007-2008), SK, as an external relations adviser at the Daedeok Innopolis research cluster, and was appointed to serve on the committee for city administration (2010-2011) and for foreign investment (2009-2010) for the city of Daejeon. Pastreich also served previously as the Director of the KORUS House (2005-2007), a think tank for international relations housed in the Korean Embassy in Washington D.C., and as the editor-in-chief of Dynamic Korea<\/em>, a journal of the Korean Foreign Ministry that introduces Korean culture and society. Prof. Pastreich is no doubt an expert on Asian affairs well versed in Asian languages and having working experience in SK, Japan and Taiwan, Asian allies of the U.S.
 
Recently, Professor Pastreich published a lengthy opinion in the Korea Times (5\/12\/2018), entitled, From the Prison Cells of Guantanamo Bay to Embassy in Seoul – Harry Harris, the rise of an American warlord. His opinion is certainly very explicit in criticizing the inappropriateness of appointing General Harris as the ambassador to SK, while NK and SK are attempting to make peace and the U.S. is trying to negotiate with NK for denuclearization. But more importantly, his arguments for against Harris\u2019s appointment touch upon the strategy of \u2018Pivot\u2019 and who is guiding it into a wrong path. In my analysis, Pastreich had made an astute observation and his opinion deserves US mainstream media coverage and clarification as well as our serious reflection. Thus, after presenting a brief history of \u2018Pivot\u2019 and Professor Pastreich\u2019s scholarly background above, I am ready to use the next column to discuss Prof. Pastreich\u2019s essay in detail. The arguments against and the inappropriateness of General Harry Harris\u2019s appointment as ambassador to SK (after Australians expressed displeasure to his appointment as Ambassador to Australia), a detailed account of General Harris\u2019s Navy career rising like a warlord (including his role as the Commander of Quantanamo Prison Camp and rapid promotions to become the Commander of Pacific Command) and what factional groups existing in the U.S. military will be discussed, analyzed and interpreted in relation to the U.S. \u2018Pivot to Asia\u2019 policy as part II.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\r\n
\r\n \r\n <\/i>\r\n <\/a>\r\n <\/span>\r\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

 Pivot to Asia has been a key component of the U.S. foreign policy since Obama Administration. With Asian countries rapidly rising economically, such a policy is logical. However, the interpretation and implementation of the policy is subject to question on its true purpose and ultimate objectives. The current tension in the South China Sea, Korea Peninsula and Iran and over all intense relationship with and among China, India, Japan and Russia begs answers on what does the U.S. really hope to accomplish with her Asia Pacific foreign policy. The actions and their consequences up till now have left Asia in stress against Asian countries\u2019 desire which is to achieve prosperity through economic development. The U.S. seems to have made a wrong assumption or taken the wrong actions leading to unexpected outcome. The \u2018Pivot\u2019 or \u2018Rebalancing\u2019 term was introduced in the Fall of 2011 during the Obama Administration, but the core of …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[130],"tags":[110],"class_list":["post-4116","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-articles","tag-dr-wordman"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/us-chinaforum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4116","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/us-chinaforum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/us-chinaforum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/us-chinaforum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/us-chinaforum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4116"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/us-chinaforum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4116\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/us-chinaforum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4116"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/us-chinaforum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4116"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/us-chinaforum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4116"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}